From: "Amanda Fay" <amanda@afay.net.au>
> To: "Mike Davies" <info@saveperthhills.org >
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 7:09 AM
>
>
 Dear Mike,

 Further to our discussion last week, we are disappointed that you chose
 not to proceed with the meeting based on the attendance of the developer.

 As you are aware, the meeting was called in light of recent media

 information that suggested that the Parkerville project was not fully

 understood.  The meeting would give project partners the opportunity to
 provide accurate information and address the concerns of the Group.
 Please
 be aware that this meeting was never to be a forum for prompt decisions
 made by the developer.  In fact, as the land owner, he is not qualified or in
 the
 position to make planning decisions and relies on the advice and guidance
 of
 planning consultants.

 Other concerns, such as marketing material, would also need to be

 investigated after the meeting.  If such concerns are correct, they would
 have certainly have been done in error and without malicious intent.

 As there is no real place for the developer at a technically focussed

 meeting, we did not think his attendance would be an issue.  However,

 since the meeting was cancelled on this basis, we must assume that

 your motivation to attend was somewhat different to that of the

 meeting's purpose - a forum for accurate information to be

 transferred.

 If your interest in details of the project is genuine, we would be more
 than

 happy to reschedule an appointment with the planning consultants and

 myself.
 We are very interested in hearing your concerns and addressing them where
 possible.

 I trust you appreciate our position in this situation and hope we can

 establish a productive communication flow which is in the best interest of
 both parties.

 Kind regards,

 Amanda Fay
 for Parkerville Highlands